Digital marketing for letting agents
Tenants find you on the portals. Landlords are the ones worth marketing to, and they are not one audience but three.
Get your free auditThe diagnosis
Why agency marketing usually targets the wrong person
Most letting agency websites are built for tenants: property search, filters, availability. That work is largely wasted, because tenants start on Rightmove and Zoopla and arrive at your site already knowing which property they want.
The person worth reaching is the landlord, and they search rarely, deliberately, and with real money at stake. They are comparing fee structures, service levels and whether you will actually answer the phone when something floods at the weekend.
The second failure is treating landlords as one audience. An accidental landlord who inherited a house has almost nothing in common with someone running twelve units, and marketing that speaks to both speaks convincingly to neither.
Your work
The three landlords, and what each is actually asking
Each needs different content, different proof and a different offer.
- The accidental landlord: inherited or unable to sell, nervous, asking what their legal obligations are and whether they can afford to get this wrong
- The portfolio landlord: two to twenty units, commercially minded, comparing fee percentages and asking about void periods and arrears rates
- The remote or overseas landlord: cannot attend, needs full management, asking about inspections, reporting and how problems get handled without them
- Tenant-facing content still needs to exist, but it is a service obligation rather than a growth channel
- Compliance content, from deposit protection to EPC and licensing, which is what the anxious landlord is really searching for
The buying journey
From letting decision to signed management agreement
A property becomes available
Inherited, vacated, or bought to let. The first searches are about obligations, not about agents.
They work out what they legally must do
Deposit protection, safety certificates, right to rent. Whoever answers these questions clearly gets remembered.
They compare self-managing against using an agent
Most agency sites skip this entirely and lose the argument by default.
They compare two or three agents
Fees, service tiers, and local proof. Reviews from landlords matter far more than reviews from tenants.
Management agreement signed
A recurring revenue relationship, which is what makes a landlord worth many times a tenant in marketing terms.
Straight answers
Common questions
- Should we bother with SEO when the portals dominate?
- For tenant searches, the portals will win and it is not worth fighting. For landlord searches they are far weaker, and that is the traffic worth having.
- We cover four towns but only have one office. Should we build a page per town?
- You can have genuinely useful town pages with real local content, but you should not have a Business Profile where you have no premises. Setting a service area does not produce map rankings, and claiming an address you do not occupy risks suspension.
- What converts a landlord?
- Clarity on fees, evidence you handle problems, and landlord reviews. In that order.
- Is paid search worth it?
- For landlord terms, often yes, because the lifetime value of a management agreement is high. For tenant terms, almost never.
- How do we compete with the online-only agents on fees?
- You do not compete on fee percentage. You compete on what happens when something goes wrong, which is the thing they cannot offer and the thing landlords most fear.
Also work with
Free audit
Find out what is actually costing you enquiries
A written audit of your site, your rankings and your ad account, back within five working days, plus a call to walk through it.
Get your free auditNo obligation to go further, and plenty of firms do not.